Who Has the Better Fish?

  • Posted on August 31, 2005 at 2:43 pm

Burger King or McDonald’s?

Well, I figured this one out for myself today. I’ve been craving a McDonald’s Filet-o-Fish for a couple of days, so we decided to go out and grab some fast food for lunch. Terry wanted an angus burger from Burger King, so I thought I would try their BK Big Fish sandwich.

And the answer is? Well, the Big Fish sandwich was much larger than the McDonalds sandwich for the same amount of money. This was a plus. And it had lettuce and onion and other sandwich-y stuff. Plus. But the tartar sauce had this vague aftertaste of mint or something to it. Minus. And there was no cheese. BIG minus.

All and all, I’ll be sticking to my tried and true McDonald’s Filet-o-Fish in the future. Maybe it has something to do with having worked at McDonald’s for a couple of summers many years ago. Or maybe not. But, for me, it all comes down to the tartar sauce. Make or break. And I like McDonald’s tartar sauce FAR better than Burger King’s.

Sorry, but when it comes to fish, the King is dead. 😉

2 Comments on Who Has the Better Fish?

  1. Carol says:

    I agree! Nothing beats a McDonald’s Filet O Fish 🙂 I even eat them on my low carb diet – extra tartar, no bun – yummy – BK fish is terrible 🙂

  2. harsha says:

    I’m with you!! I simply can’t stomach BK fish LOL.

Leave a Reply

My Stick Family from WiddlyTinks.com